2010
01.22

The other day I was reading up on the various New Deal programs that were created then to get through the Great Depression. ^_^ Among them was a great deal of arts programs, the ancestor of modern government programs which sponsor artists, writers, playwrights, etc. (Of course, my high school had its arts program cut in my senior year, but…)

This got me thinking: could RPGs ever be deemed worthy of federal money? They could definitely be considered an art form — in addition to the writing and live-action performance elements, there is a strong connection to oral storytelling, which has its own guilds and subculture, like the Masons, that not many outsiders know about. Of course, there are risks that could come with accepting this money, such as the possibility that DMs might be forced to produce pro-government work (so no games of Dark Conspiracy, KULT, Shadowrun, Cyberpunk, CthulhuTech…). But if the government was willing to stay hands-off, it could produce a great blossoming of roleplaying games. I know many DMs who would appreciate the opportunity to develop their campaigns without having to worry about financial pressures. It is similar to the Italian Renaissance when artists such as Michaelangelo worked under the patron system — but they didn’t do RPGs about how the evil Medicis were plotting to destroy Rome.

Of course, perhaps now is not the best economic or political time for this to be brought up. It is questionable whether a bill specifically setting aside money for Dungeon Masters (and players in the form of books, dice, pencils, etc.) could get through the Senate or Congress at the present time. RPGs might have to hide under the coattails of a more general ‘arts’ fund, with each game defended on a case-by-case basis, bean-counted down to every last hit point.

Personally, I think there are better ways to approach RPGing. My proposal is starting a petition to grant RPG publishers tax-exempt status. Of course, in return for this exemption, the publishers would have to make their sourcebooks and rules set open to the public — if they REALLY want people to play their games, if they are a sincere publisher, then exposure will be more important to them than money. Eventually, when the system has proven to be a success, “roleplay-based organizations” could even become eligible for federal funding and have an office devoted to them, perhaps along with neighborhood and community organizations, since most gaming groups are only 4-8 people. Perhaps this could be a second-term project for Obama?

Bookmark and Share

4 comments so far

Add Your Comment
  1. Heh, as a Libertarian I’m not sure which idea makes me cringe more….the idea of writing an RPG set to Federal Standards to receive money, or the idea of playing said game.

    Let’s keep the politics out of gaming please :)

  2. In Norway, where I live, quite a few roleplaying organizations and conventions recieve governement funding. The only demands that need to be met are that the organisations recieving governemental funds must be democratic, open to all and have at least five members under the age of 25. A project supporting writers of rpg books also recieved support from the National Arts Council about ten years ago. Funds for youthorganisations are drawn mostly from the national lottery, I believe. But in the States? I doubt that day will ever come.

  3. Wow, what very different opinions…! ^^

    @Patrick — This makes me want to visit Norway more than ever. I’d love to check out the local LARPs and roleplaying culture.

    @Rev. Lazaro — I generally support arts programs, so I think if they exist, it would be cool to see some of that money spent on RPGs. However, it does seem like the political climate in the US wouldn’t support it right now anyway :p

  4. At first, I thought this post seemed patently silly, but then Patrick’s response made me realize that this was only absurd in the US–our political climate certainly wouldn’t lend itself to such funding as readily as nations with a greater dedication to arts endowments. That being said, you shouldn’t feel compelled in any way to refrain from writing about politics on your blog–especially because you didn’t express any opinions as to political affiliation or ideology. Frankly, “Rev. Lazaro” should check his politics at the door, as he’s the only one who decided to wave the ideological flag here.